For foreign exchange investors one of the key issues facing the currency markets will be the future behaviour of China, India and the rest of the Far East. They hold huge foreign currency and gold reserves, particularly, if measured against their GDP. They maybe holding them in order to provide China stimulus. Similarly, it may be part of a movement toward a one world currency.
Whichever the reason, they are hoarding reserves and the implications are significant. The hoarding creates a global structural imbalance between countries that are savers and investors. As a consequence,many see the need for the Asian countries to start spending and stop saving, in order to bring the imbalance back.
This article explores the issues of how and why they are saving. Firstly, here is a selected table of foreign exchange and gold reserves as a share of GDP (trillions) courtesy of the CIA:
Whichever the reason, they are hoarding reserves and the implications are significant. The hoarding creates a global structural imbalance between countries that are savers and investors. As a consequence,many see the need for the Asian countries to start spending and stop saving, in order to bring the imbalance back.
China Foreign Currency Reserves and GDP. One World Currency?
FX & Gold Reserves GDP Reserves as % GDP
China 2.42 4.8 50.3%
India .28 1.1 25.4%
Japan 1.02 5.1 20%
China 2.42 4.8 50.3%
India .28 1.1 25.4%
Japan 1.02 5.1 20%
S Korea .27 .8 33%
Brazil .24 1.5 16%
Germany .18 3.3 5.4%
USA .13 14.4 1%
China is the outlier and will be the focus of attention. In addition, India reserves are large and growing rapidly.
In 2009 the Financial Times ran a cover story about how Asian bank ICBC had recently become the world’s largest bank by market cap and deposits, but yet held only about half of the assets of JPMorgan. This illustrates the fact that the amount of credit available and savings rates, is related to the relative sophistication of banking systems.The Asian banks tend to have lower assets/deposits ratio.
Indeed, the ideal ‘halfway house’ solution to the banking crisis could have been extensive investment and involvement into the banks by the Asians. The banks get the cash, the Asians buy the expertise. Unfortunately, Lehman Bros failed to pull off the deal with the Koreans and, the rest is history.
No one would argue for a repeat of the sub-prime debacle in Asia but there needs to be some changes. The point is that spending/savings rates are directly affected by the availability of credit and the nature of the banking system. As Asian banks become more experienced at securitising loans, then it is likely that decreased savings rates will follow.
Demographic issues are obvious issue, particularly with the population aging, in Japan. Japanese pension funds needing to match liabilities and older people require short term, low risk assets. If compounded with their conditioning towards bonds (in particular US Treasuries) after being in a long term deflationary economy, then the result is a willingness to save at low yields.
More subtle is the understanding that the continental Europeans and Asians have differing cultural orientations to the Anglo-Saxons. They are more egalitarian in wealth distribution, and the Japanese seem to be entirely happy to preserve their cultural predispositions at the expense of economic growth.
This facet of wealth distribution has implications for relative spending patterns between egalitarian & Anglo-Saxon economies. The evidence suggests that it is the wealthier individuals (who hold a larger share of wealth in the Anglo-Saxon economies) that take the larger part of debt, so it is hard to see a structural shift here, anytime soon.
The most problematic of the savings patterns is the Chinese and other Asian growth economies. Objectively, they are nuts to buy US Treasuries. Why would anyone swap investment in their own higher return economy for lower return US debt?
The first answer is that they are buying US Dollar assets in order to weaken their currency and thus support export demand for their industries. The second is in understanding the policy intent following the Asian Financial Crisis. China currency manipulation in order to peg to the dollar is a clear policy objective,made, in order to protect against the mayhem caused in 1997.
However, what happens if the Chinese get emboldened from the use of their reserves to generate domestic demand, as opposed to paying for the bail outs? What if they- in the face of slowing US consumption- decide to pull out of buying US Treasuries, and encourage the (increasingly economically interlinked) Japanese to follow them? Many see this is a possible scenario.
Who is spending what is also a critical concern. For example, free marketeers believe that the private sector is usually more efficient. It is not just about matching savings and investment. It is also about who is doing the saving and investment. Economic liberals don’t like Government spending, whether it’s in the US or China.
They would see hiking public spending (at the expense of private) as a portion of GDP is a drag on growth, in itself.
The big China story is about realizing the nascent energy that was held back by Communism. In doing so, they allowed the influx of Western know-how and, Chinese consumer demand was critical in that process. The China story is not about how wonderful the central command economy was, so ‘let’s have some more of it.’
In addition, what happens when the Chinese/Asians start generating significant domestic demand? Will they operate an open economy in this regard, and contribute to global growth, or will they replicate the Japanese corporate model? This involves internal competition, but also doing anything they can to avoid competing with each other in foreign markets. Meanwhile, the Government protects them from foreign competition, by engaging in restrictive trade practices. It is not clear that increased Chinese spending will boost western export markets.
So in conclusion, the global economy does need the savers to start spending, but the outcome of it, is far from clear. The west may have been free market oriented and universal in its outlook, but it doesn’t mean that the Asians will be. However, given the interlinkage in the global economy the likelihood is, of continued international coordination. The graduated shift in approach from the Asians (in relation to buying US debt) should enable piecemeal restructuring elsewhere, however it does suggest risks of low global growth over the next few years.
Source:
CIA "The World Factbook" CIA website
Brazil .24 1.5 16%
Germany .18 3.3 5.4%
USA .13 14.4 1%
China is the outlier and will be the focus of attention. In addition, India reserves are large and growing rapidly.
The Growth in Emerging Market Banking
Indeed, the ideal ‘halfway house’ solution to the banking crisis could have been extensive investment and involvement into the banks by the Asians. The banks get the cash, the Asians buy the expertise. Unfortunately, Lehman Bros failed to pull off the deal with the Koreans and, the rest is history.
No one would argue for a repeat of the sub-prime debacle in Asia but there needs to be some changes. The point is that spending/savings rates are directly affected by the availability of credit and the nature of the banking system. As Asian banks become more experienced at securitising loans, then it is likely that decreased savings rates will follow.
Culture & Demographics in China and Far East
More subtle is the understanding that the continental Europeans and Asians have differing cultural orientations to the Anglo-Saxons. They are more egalitarian in wealth distribution, and the Japanese seem to be entirely happy to preserve their cultural predispositions at the expense of economic growth.
This facet of wealth distribution has implications for relative spending patterns between egalitarian & Anglo-Saxon economies. The evidence suggests that it is the wealthier individuals (who hold a larger share of wealth in the Anglo-Saxon economies) that take the larger part of debt, so it is hard to see a structural shift here, anytime soon.
The Asian Financial Crisis and Foreign Currency
The first answer is that they are buying US Dollar assets in order to weaken their currency and thus support export demand for their industries. The second is in understanding the policy intent following the Asian Financial Crisis. China currency manipulation in order to peg to the dollar is a clear policy objective,made, in order to protect against the mayhem caused in 1997.
However, what happens if the Chinese get emboldened from the use of their reserves to generate domestic demand, as opposed to paying for the bail outs? What if they- in the face of slowing US consumption- decide to pull out of buying US Treasuries, and encourage the (increasingly economically interlinked) Japanese to follow them? Many see this is a possible scenario.
China Stimulus and Government Spending
They would see hiking public spending (at the expense of private) as a portion of GDP is a drag on growth, in itself.
The big China story is about realizing the nascent energy that was held back by Communism. In doing so, they allowed the influx of Western know-how and, Chinese consumer demand was critical in that process. The China story is not about how wonderful the central command economy was, so ‘let’s have some more of it.’
China Domestic Demand
Global Economy
Source:
CIA "The World Factbook" CIA website
No comments:
Post a Comment